<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Small Payments Won&#8217;t Save Publishers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/02/why-small-payments-wont-save-publishers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/02/why-small-payments-wont-save-publishers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 04:35:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rupert Murdoch vs. The Sandman. &#124; Mass Comments &#124; Blogs &#124; Loyola University New Orleans</title>
		<link>http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/02/why-small-payments-wont-save-publishers/comment-page-3/#comment-1853</link>
		<dc:creator>Rupert Murdoch vs. The Sandman. &#124; Mass Comments &#124; Blogs &#124; Loyola University New Orleans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 18:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shirky.com/weblog/?p=4#comment-1853</guid>
		<description>[...] Others don’t. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Others don’t. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sket på nettet den 01.10.09</title>
		<link>http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/02/why-small-payments-wont-save-publishers/comment-page-3/#comment-1763</link>
		<dc:creator>Sket på nettet den 01.10.09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shirky.com/weblog/?p=4#comment-1763</guid>
		<description>[...] Why Small Payments Won’t Save Publishers « Clay Shirky &#8212; 4:55pm via [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Small Payments Won’t Save Publishers « Clay Shirky &mdash; 4:55pm via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bland dig i debatten på politiken.dk</title>
		<link>http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/02/why-small-payments-wont-save-publishers/comment-page-3/#comment-1732</link>
		<dc:creator>Bland dig i debatten på politiken.dk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shirky.com/weblog/?p=4#comment-1732</guid>
		<description>[...] Internettet har lige rundet det skarpe hjørne, 40, og blev i den anledning fejret med boller, lagkage og fødselsdagsopsang i The Economist, hvor der lød et lidt trist hurra: ”En midtvejskrise truer Internettet”. Det er ikke overraskende, at en et konservativt medie som The Economist går til Internettet med samme begejstring, som vi andre går til opvasken. Den samme dystopiske tilgang fornemmer man også af og til hos chefredaktører fra etablerede medier, som ser Internettet som en ting, man skal forsvare sig imod og beskytte sit indhold imod. Den evige debat om, hvorvidt medier som fx New York Times og L.A. Times skal tage mikrobetaling for deres indhold, er et godt eksempel på en reaktiv tilgang til Internettet, som Internet-eksperten Clay Shirky også har sagt ved flere lejligheder. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Internettet har lige rundet det skarpe hjørne, 40, og blev i den anledning fejret med boller, lagkage og fødselsdagsopsang i The Economist, hvor der lød et lidt trist hurra: ”En midtvejskrise truer Internettet”. Det er ikke overraskende, at en et konservativt medie som The Economist går til Internettet med samme begejstring, som vi andre går til opvasken. Den samme dystopiske tilgang fornemmer man også af og til hos chefredaktører fra etablerede medier, som ser Internettet som en ting, man skal forsvare sig imod og beskytte sit indhold imod. Den evige debat om, hvorvidt medier som fx New York Times og L.A. Times skal tage mikrobetaling for deres indhold, er et godt eksempel på en reaktiv tilgang til Internettet, som Internet-eksperten Clay Shirky også har sagt ved flere lejligheder. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This week in media musings: Advocacy journalism&#8217;s (bogus) failings and more paywall options &#124; Mark Coddington</title>
		<link>http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/02/why-small-payments-wont-save-publishers/comment-page-3/#comment-1724</link>
		<dc:creator>This week in media musings: Advocacy journalism&#8217;s (bogus) failings and more paywall options &#124; Mark Coddington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shirky.com/weblog/?p=4#comment-1724</guid>
		<description>[...] this year&#8217;s manifesto on the subject from Time&#8217;s Walter Isaacson, and here&#8217;s a refutation from new media guru Clay Shirky. In light of the Google micropayments news, journalism prof Mindy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this year&#8217;s manifesto on the subject from Time&#8217;s Walter Isaacson, and here&#8217;s a refutation from new media guru Clay Shirky. In light of the Google micropayments news, journalism prof Mindy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why I want to pay for news &#124; Sealed Abstract</title>
		<link>http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/02/why-small-payments-wont-save-publishers/comment-page-3/#comment-1721</link>
		<dc:creator>Why I want to pay for news &#124; Sealed Abstract</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shirky.com/weblog/?p=4#comment-1721</guid>
		<description>[...] of all, I&#8217;m in the minority.  Lots of smart people don&#8217;t like paying for news.  A new story about why paying for news is bad shows up in my RSS reader every [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of all, I&#8217;m in the minority.  Lots of smart people don&#8217;t like paying for news.  A new story about why paying for news is bad shows up in my RSS reader every [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MISCmedia &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SAVING THE P-I, PART TEN OR ELEVEN (I lost count)</title>
		<link>http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/02/why-small-payments-wont-save-publishers/comment-page-3/#comment-1715</link>
		<dc:creator>MISCmedia &#187; Blog Archive &#187; SAVING THE P-I, PART TEN OR ELEVEN (I lost count)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shirky.com/weblog/?p=4#comment-1715</guid>
		<description>[...] Mark Potts, Alan Mutter, Steve Outing, Philip Meyer, Jane Stevens, Dan Vigil, Jeff Jarvis, Clay Shirky, my pal Paul Andrews, and ex-Microsoftie Michael [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mark Potts, Alan Mutter, Steve Outing, Philip Meyer, Jane Stevens, Dan Vigil, Jeff Jarvis, Clay Shirky, my pal Paul Andrews, and ex-Microsoftie Michael [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Future of News: In quotes&#160;&#124;&#160;idio</title>
		<link>http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/02/why-small-payments-wont-save-publishers/comment-page-3/#comment-1713</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future of News: In quotes&#160;&#124;&#160;idio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shirky.com/weblog/?p=4#comment-1713</guid>
		<description>[...] it up in his own delicious way, Clay Shirky says: The word ‘micropayment’ is a trope for desperation, entering the vernacular of a given [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it up in his own delicious way, Clay Shirky says: The word ‘micropayment’ is a trope for desperation, entering the vernacular of a given [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why ITV’s micropayment plan is unlikely to make the Grade &#124; DAILYMAIL</title>
		<link>http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/02/why-small-payments-wont-save-publishers/comment-page-3/#comment-1629</link>
		<dc:creator>Why ITV’s micropayment plan is unlikely to make the Grade &#124; DAILYMAIL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 06:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shirky.com/weblog/?p=4#comment-1629</guid>
		<description>[...] cite Apple&#8217;s iTunes Music Store as proof that micropayments can work on the net. But, as Shirky argued earlier this year, the fee-per-track model works because this is a rare example where no alternative exists. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] cite Apple&#8217;s iTunes Music Store as proof that micropayments can work on the net. But, as Shirky argued earlier this year, the fee-per-track model works because this is a rare example where no alternative exists. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why ITV&#8217;s micropayment plan is unlikely to make the Grade &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/02/why-small-payments-wont-save-publishers/comment-page-3/#comment-1626</link>
		<dc:creator>Why ITV&#8217;s micropayment plan is unlikely to make the Grade &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shirky.com/weblog/?p=4#comment-1626</guid>
		<description>[...] cite Apple&#8217;s iTunes Music Store as proof that micropayments can work on the net. But, as Shirky argued earlier this year, the fee-per-track model works because this is a rare example where no alternative exists. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] cite Apple&#8217;s iTunes Music Store as proof that micropayments can work on the net. But, as Shirky argued earlier this year, the fee-per-track model works because this is a rare example where no alternative exists. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Depth: How nanopayments finally came of age</title>
		<link>http://www.shirky.com/weblog/2009/02/why-small-payments-wont-save-publishers/comment-page-3/#comment-1617</link>
		<dc:creator>In Depth: How nanopayments finally came of age</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shirky.com/weblog/?p=4#comment-1617</guid>
		<description>[...] a response to the Time article, blogger Clay Shirky suggests nanopayments can only succeed when a provider has a monopoly on a particular type of content and a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a response to the Time article, blogger Clay Shirky suggests nanopayments can only succeed when a provider has a monopoly on a particular type of content and a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

